Strategy × Howell Framework

MSTR Convergence & STRC Model

BTC accumulation through the liquidity contraction STRC amplification of per-share economics Framework credit: Grain of Salt (@Z06Z07)
01 — The Convergence

Three catalysts landing in the same 12-month window

Strategy accumulates Bitcoin during the liquidity contraction at compressed prices. Then the expansion ignites — with the April 2028 halving and forced monetary easing converging in the same window.

Strategy BTC holdings
843,738
As of 4 Jun 2026
42/42 plan capacity
$84B
Through 2027
% of 21M supply
4.02%
Current
MSTR beta to BTC
2-3x
Historical upside
Strategy BTC accumulation vs Howell liquidity cycle (Q2 2026 — Q1 2030)
Strategy BTC holdings (M) Global liquidity index Key catalyst

Saylor buys at every price level — that's the strategy. But the contraction phase is where each dollar buys the most coins. If Howell's trough lands mid-2027, Strategy will have spent roughly 18 months accumulating at compressed prices while the rest of the market is fearful, illiquid, and selling. The buying doesn't stop when the expansion hits — it just gets more expensive per coin.

The expansion phase (mid-2027 to late 2029) then reprices the entire accumulated stack upward. Bitcoin correlates ~0.82 with global M2 on a 60-70 day lag, and the first 12-18 months of a liquidity expansion historically deliver the sharpest move.

02 — Supply Squeeze

Who owns Bitcoin when the expansion hits?

At projected 2027-29 holdings, the freely tradeable float shrinks dramatically. When the liquidity expansion drives new demand into a market with a shrinking float, price dynamics become non-linear.

2.15M
Strategy ETFs Long-term / lost Free float
Strategy % of supply
10.2%
Free float remaining
6.4M
Free float % of supply
30.7%

At 2.15M BTC (scenarios 1-3), the free float drops to ~6.4M — about 31% of total supply. At 3.21M (scenario 4), it falls to ~5.4M or 26%. When the liquidity expansion drives new demand into that shrinking float, the result is the kind of supply squeeze that historically produces non-linear price moves.

03 — The STRC Amplification Effect

How preferred shares change the per-share economics

Framework credit: Grain of Salt (@Z06Z07). STRC preferred shares fund BTC purchases without diluting common shareholders — halving dilution from 11% to 5.5% per quarter while maintaining the same 16% BTC accumulation rate.

Avg quarterly BTC growth
16%
2020-2025 historical
Pre-STRC share growth
11%/qtr
Heavy common dilution
Post-STRC share growth
5.5%/qtr
Preferred absorbs ~50%
STRC funding mix
42-75%
Rising toward 50/50+
04 — BTC per share

The only metric that matters

Dilution only destroys value if BTC per share declines. STRC halves dilution while maintaining the same BTC accumulation rate — doubling BTC/share growth.

BTC per common share — four scenarios (Q4 2025 — Q4 2029)
S1: Historical (no STRC) S2: STRC amplification S3: STRC + higher BTC price S4: Reflexive accumulation
Without STRC (historical)

BTC growth: 16%/qtr — Share dilution: 11%/qtr — Net BTC/share growth: ~4.3%/qtr — Shares by Q4 2029: ~716M

With STRC amplification

BTC growth: 16%/qtr — Share dilution: 5.5%/qtr — Net BTC/share growth: ~9%/qtr — Shares by Q4 2029: ~498M

05 — MSTR Share Price Projection

Four scenarios through the 2029-30 cycle peak

Price = mNAV x BTC price x BTC per share. Set the mNAV multiple to see how each scenario resolves.

2.0x
S1: Historical S2: STRC amplified S3: STRC + higher BTC S4: Reflexive Current ~$130
06 — Endpoint Comparison

Q4 2029: how each scenario resolves at the cycle peak

All four scenarios use the same mechanical framework — the only variables are BTC accumulation rate, share dilution rate, and Bitcoin price path.