Supply-elasticity model · Path to $1M

Can Strategy Buy BTC to $1M?

There are only ~5.4M liquid BTC available for purchase. Current demand absorbs ~6,000/day while mining adds only ~450/day. As the liquid pool drains, each marginal purchase has a larger price impact — the price curve goes hyperbolic. This is the supply-depletion argument for $1M BTC.

The setup — liquid BTC is finite
Circulating supply
19.8M BTC
Liquid (available)
5.4M BTC (27%)
Illiquid (HODLed / lost)
14.4M BTC (73%)
Daily absorption (current)
~6,000 BTC/day
Daily mining (new supply)
~450 BTC/day
Net daily drain
~5,550 BTC/day

At current absorption rates, ~X days of liquid supply remain before depletion.

BTC price
$77K
from $77K
Liquid supply
5.40M
27.3% of circ.
Strategy holds
818K
4.1% of all BTC
Strategy value
$63B
Spent: $0B
BTC price path — log scale with $1M reference
Period BTC price Liquid Liq % Strategy BTC Strat % Spent Mkt cap Strat value

The answer

Strategy doesn't need to buy all the remaining BTC. They just need to keep buying at a pace that, combined with ETFs, sovereign buyers and retail, drains liquid supply fast enough to trigger the supply-elasticity repricing. The STRC flywheel is the persistent, reflexive bid that doesn't stop.

The critical variable: elasticity

The elasticity slider is the most important parameter. It determines how much the price responds to each unit of liquid supply removed. At 1.0x (linear), draining 50% of liquid supply doubles the price. At 2.0x (aggressive), it quadruples. Historical BTC supply shocks (halvings, exchange collapses) suggest elasticity between 1.3–2.0x. The academic research from Rudd & Porter (2025) models a median BTC price of $5.17M by 2036 using similar supply-depletion dynamics. Try sliding elasticity from 1.0 to 2.0 and watch how the price path changes — this is the variable that determines whether $1M is reached in 3 years or 10.

Why this might fail

  1. Liquid supply isn't fixed. Price rises create new sellers. HODLers who bought at $10K become sellers at $200K. 80,000 ancient BTC were sold in July 2025 at the cycle peak. The 5.4M liquid figure is a snapshot, not a floor.
  2. ETF flows reverse. ETFs had net outflows in Jan–Feb 2026. In a sustained bear market, ETFs become sellers, not buyers. The model assumes persistent positive flows.
  3. STRC issuance slows or stops. If BTC drops 40–50%, STRC credit quality deteriorates. STRC falls below par. New issuance becomes uneconomic. The Strategy bid disappears.
  4. Dividend drag becomes real. At $1B/month for 5 years, cumulative STRC is ~$60B with ~$7B/year in dividends. If BTC doesn't appreciate enough, dividends require selling BTC or diluting at distressed prices.
  5. Regulatory intervention. A single entity accumulating 5–10%+ of all BTC is unprecedented. Position limits, balance sheet treatment changes, or legislation could restrict Strategy's buying.
  6. Derivatives create synthetic supply. Futures and perpetuals create BTC exposure without spot purchases. This synthetic supply dampens the price impact of shrinking spot liquidity. The real elasticity may be lower than modelled.
  7. A competing asset emerges. Gold, sovereign digital currencies, or other hard assets compete for the same capital. At $1M BTC ($20T market cap), BTC would exceed gold's entire market.
  8. Global liquidity doesn't recover. Howell's cycle suggests a trough around mid-2027. A deeper or longer trough could mean 2–3 years of flat/negative absorption, extending the depletion timeline dramatically.
  9. Strategy-specific risk. Key-man risk (Saylor). SEC action. If Strategy is forced to liquidate even 10% of holdings, 81,500 BTC hits the market — 1.5% of liquid supply at once.
  10. Reflexivity works both ways. The STRC flywheel is reflexive upward. It's also reflexive downward. Lower BTC → weaker credit → less STRC demand → less buying → lower BTC. The model only shows the up-spiral.